University of Derby Get Ahead Programme 2011

Thursday 15th September, I presented to support workers and their students as part of the acclaimed University of Derby ‘Get Ahead’ student enrollment programme. This is designed to give students with a disability a more seamless, enhanced, and advance access into their University life. I presented on coping strategies for autistic students in higher education, and on the role of support workers for students on the autistic spectrum.

Copies of the presentations can be found here to download.

Case study of dealing with group work CJesson

CJesson AS in HE blog post October 2010

University of Derby Student Presentation CJesson 15-09-2011

Thanks for looking,

Chris

The Autism Show Presentation 25th June 2011 – Available to download

Hello,

What a delight it has been to be part of the first ever national Autism Show which has seen thousands of people attending the ExCEL exhibition centre over the weekend. As promised, my presentation on the University environment and coping strategies is attached to this blog post and can be accessed here The Autism Show presentation

Do get in touch using the contact me page for any queries.

Best regards,

Chris

The Autism Show, London – 24th and 25th June 2011

Hello,

In my first blog post in a while, I update you on a momentous occasion that is important for around 2 million people in the UK with a connection to the autism spectrum.

Friday 24th and Saturday 25th June sees the Autism Show arrive at the splendid ExCEL Exhibition Centre in the London Docklands. It is the first national event specifically for parents, carers, professionals, as well as people on the spectrum. The event is extremely important for visitors to obtain professional advice and support, develop personal awareness of the spectrum and gaining an insight into the personal perspective. Speakers include the Speaker of the House of Commons, John Bercow MP, Jane Asher (NAS President), and Anna Kennedy (Daily Mail Inspirational Woman of the Year).

I am thrilled to also be speaking on June 25th in the Autism Matters Theatre at 12:30pm-1.00pm, giving a presentation entitled “Autism and Higher Education – a special insight into the challenges and coping strategies for someone on the spectrum within higher education”. This will focus on adapting to the academic and social worlds of University life, and crediting the experience as enlightening autistic people to engage in their interests more freely. Coping strategies in sensitive situations will be particularly useful for professionals, mentors and support workers who may wish to identify best practice when advising their students.

I will also attend both days all day as a delegate and hope to be a beneficiary from the show in gaining more knowledge and understanding of the spectrum, especially at the opposite function away from Asperger Syndrome. I too have never previously had access to such a widespread event and it is absolutely brilliant to be both a delegate and speaker at the show.

I would advise that you please come and visit the Autism Show in London – even if you do not have a connection to the spectrum it would be a perfect, low cost, enjoyable  opportunity to raise your own awareness. Tickets are available to book online from just £8 in advance at www.autismshow.co.uk

For the full visitor brochure and itinery please click on the following link: http://www.autismshow.co.uk/visitor-brochure/

Thanks for looking,

Chris

The Big Society and Localism: My thoughts

The government is widely endorsing the Big Society and the localism agenda as key principles to drive their policies forward. I admire many aspects of this but cannot help thinking that it is very disjointed and the relationship to place has been woefully underestimated. I argue that the government has so far been missing some of the point, is not radical like it proclaims and has been far too unilateral with geography in the projects that support localism. Ultimately I state that localism and schemes initiated to deliver it have potential to leave people out spatially and that this has a far more detrimental impact on our society and planning, outweighing the importance of putting people at the heart of decisions that localism aims to meet.

 

What do I read localism to be?

It was true to form that I first became aware of localism upon the release of the Conservative Party’s green paper ‘open source planning’ but only began to take it more seriously when the coalition government was elected. Localism is conveyed as a radical change to sideswipe the centralised state and provide less barriers to ‘the people’, who in the government’s mind should be at the forefront of decision making. I read for localism to be one of the more powerful tools in exhibiting the government’s Big Society agenda, again a pinnacle of Conservative policy prior to the election as a coalition in May 2010. By encouraging civic pride and responsibility, it is envisaged that local people will feel empowered to make change in their areas.

My initial perceptions

I am quite an unusual character in that I am quite unforgiving and hostile to this government’s attitudes to the built environment and always have been. This is despite supporting some of their work in other sectors and initiatives. I am a strong proponent of regional planning and have been sad to see it lost without a chance to let it breathe. There has been widespread criticism of that particular framework but it was only implemented for a small number of years as part of sectors that are well known for a rhetoric of slow progress (see Barker and Killian Pretty, among others). So how can it be commented on with such distaste? It comes as little surprise that I am finding localism rather difficult to interpret, but am a personality that is open to reconstruction on this matter.

I show a somewhat mixed reaction, but must stress that not all of it is negative. It is all too easy to start pinpointing the opposing argument; exhibiting a bullish personality and a vanguard of emotion. But even with a subject such as localism I cannot bring myself to respond in this way. The majority of  government policy does actually have meaningful elements to it, reflecting the aspirations of their creator.  I have tried to underpin those values instead of taking the lazy route towards nitpicking.

Unease but hope

At the moment there is more unease to be displayed than joy to endorse localism, but this is because I am holding back, wanting to (and willing to) understand more about the subject and its objectives. I feel that localism has been a mass of buzzwords launched too early in advance before government has convened most of the substance together, and that is worrying. Indeed most of the uncertainty does not stem from the continual pattern of frontloading that is taking place that others might transpire to state as their concern, such as the rapid but thwarted abolishment of the regional tier and frontloading of local government spending reductions. I admire cutting to the chase, being specific and going ahead with what you stated you would do. But in order to represent true grit and determination, there needs to be some dialogue of what happens, how are conflicts going to be mitigated and a transparent framework to evaluate success. With the localism agenda I see little thought on this, and a constant drizzle of policy introductions. While I would like concrete, all I see is blancmange – that is at least until we have a proper breakdown of localism’s powers, which are slowly creeping in. I see the ideas born out of localism and the big society to have a poor spatial understanding, with policies that are too simplified. For example the New Homes Bonus, intended to incentivise house building in areas of demand, will work extremely well in the South East and other areas with housing pressures. But this will be woeful in places with negative take up, causing a funding shortfall for local authorities who will receive little merit from the Bonus. I would endorse that if Localism is to provide these kinds of measures, there needs to be multiple versions to specify not just who but where will benefit from them.

Radical? Not quite!

 I find localism to be less radical than previously thought – take the whole concept of ‘decentralisation’ for example. Under the new localism based principles local communities would have obligatory powers to produce their own neighbourhood development plan, but the housing numbers still have to either match or be higher than any previously proposed under regional planning or the local plan. We also have environmental directives to consider from Brussels, which we have little enforcement of. Therefore I would argue that true ‘pure’ localism cannot be achieved, instead an uneven patchwork quilt of civic responsibility will be encouraged across the country.

Civic responsibility is something I find a virtue here, albeit with caution

Civic responsibility is a fundamental feature of society that has in part been lost. I treasure attempts to bring some of this back into the wider rhetoric on the street and at the local level. However, the reality put into practice is that our lifestyles do not always arrange well to being responsible, supporting others and working for nothing. It is something I personally advocate, but know many personalities who would not work with the concept. Having said that, I can imagine that the element to embrace civic responsibility will work well in certain places, but will be severely dictated by geography. Places including rural areas that still have community spirit and diverse urban neighbourhoods such as student areas with higher levels of volunteering rates could benefit from localism principles and the big society. But in places that are comparatively deprived and facing similar budget reductions, or rural areas that have lost their soul to poor attitudes and wrong decisions, localism is bound to be a struggle. The big society motive may be better in these areas to rally people together as part of a wider social welfare remit, but it will be particularly weak when applied to planning. Big society and localism will no doubt fuel the power relations of whoever has the greatest stake, and the greatest influence on development proposals. With the advent of neighbourhood plans, this is likely to get larger as the prospect of developer funded plans may become a reality.

But there surely will be a  rise of the third sector even during times of restraint and potential austerity

Overall, I see much potential for the third sector, despite their own financial pressures brought on by questionable times, to experience a rise of take up or interest in their work from local people as a result of localism. This is inevitable, no matter what the variety of opinion is on the matter, and is accentuated if protest goes unheeded.  If the government acts on its ideologies and mobilised campaigns to protect the built environment fail, then in certain places people will have no choice but to join such organisations to try and make their areas work once again. Furthermore, the voluntary sector can be a means with which to represent a stronger unified voice to inform the government on best ways forward. I can increasingly see the third sector starting to lean on the side of pressure groups as a result of localism; their bargaining power increased but the eventual decision not necessarily as decentralised as first imagined.

 Thanks for looking,

Chris

This article is written from a personal perspective.

Living through the world of Aspergers in Higher Education

Hello,

In my first comprehensive blog post for a while, I write to go through some of the worlds and scenarios experienced on a daily basis and how the contribution of Asperger Syndrome fuels the their appearance, management and operation. This post is indeed a precursor to the more detailed section on university life that forms part of my book, Asperger and Me. I hope you read this section with interest and take an understanding from it. Please get in touch through the ‘Contact page’.

Living through the world of Aspergers in Higher Education

As I commence fourth year studies, I reminisce about the way in which AS is presented to fellow students. Plenty has been asked in the past three years in Sheffield as to how I essentially view items in life compared to other students and it is more under preoccupation now that this is not always communicated in the best way. I realised towards the end of third year that I had become rather bitter about communicating with some people and came across stern, stubborn and without empathy, and for this I apologise. To you I hope this post will help you in the understanding and that I, and other people in similar situations sometimes have little self awareness on expression and presentation to other people. Some of your inquisitiveness to ask more inquisitively, and not patronisingly about AS has most definately been a good standpoint as despite the environmental difficulties imposed on the wider field of disability, I appreciate it can be very difficult to ask someone of the parameters of their condition.

General Context to Specific Interest Areas

Asperger Syndrome is more commonly associated with undertaking more intense specific interests and having remarkable attention to detail. For me, this has extended over the years to most forms of transport, geography including buildings. Most of the transportation agenda waned by the time I was fourteen, resulting in a less compulsive desire to memorise train timetables, or indeed be enthralled by a comparatively banal regional service to my local town. Equally, by fourteen there was less of a preoccupation to visit East Midlands Airport to view that same Sunday afternoon arrival from Jersey. But the specifics of going to that venue to see that particular vehicle transferred in other ways and today the specific interests have taken a different turn.

In recent years the transportation agenda has been mostly exclusive to cars – I’m in incessent petrolhead – the sort that does not know how to change anything mechanically but reminisces about certain specifics of cars. I was well known for example of ordering car brochures, reading them once and never again, only to read off the equipment specifications and where they were built. I also am a strong proponent of British Cars (despite the lack of nowadays) and have such a belated following to MG Rover vehicles. I source these specifics down to a routined way of thinking and understanding that comes with my AS diagnosis. I stand out in this regard for being so rigid. For example, no other car other than an MG Rover product was considered when buying a motor. Even with them going bankrupt 5 years ago and the vehicles getting ever old the aim at some point is to stick with idiosyncratic opinion and conform to the pipe and slippers beige leather/walnut dashboard environment that is so nice to sit in!

Where Town Planning as  a ‘Specific Interest Area’ arised from…

A second specific interest has been in geography, maps and buildings, commencing a long time ago. Back in 1997 at the age of 8, when everyone else at the kids club was away on the playstation or getting sucked into some other technology, I was sat at the table producing large A0, A1 and A2 maps based on the AA mapbook system or intricately laid out place with every individual building, road, road sign, tree, gate, and so on created on the paper. The specifics within the maps in particular were churches, cathedrals, railways, airports and brands, reflecting major interests of the time and things I saw out of the window on random car trips to town. Towns and cities were based on real places but often with a change of name , and I am pleased to say some of these maps still exist – place names included “Teeds”, “Tollbridge”, “Halifax”, “Harborough” and so on. Halifax even had the National Railway Museum, miraculously moved from York.

The overarching interest in geography has extended from this initial base point of maps right way through the educational stages. I would not have been so rigid and focused, more so than most other students, to be able to say at age 12 that I wanted to do Town Planning at University. ….

And so thats what I went for….

I took a route towards Higher Education to serve my specific interest of the built environment, but also because it is the only option for full town planning chartership. This suits the no-nonsense approach that many might associate me with, cutting to the chase and not allowing for much wish wash on the ways that you can achieve something.

Delaying aspirations and support methods that brought them back

Through secondary education I had to delay those aspirations at times, as these stages brought toil and trouble through bullying, crushing of ones specific interest and commitment into a culture of sameness, being sheeps and lemmings, a ‘me-too’ attitude, among the other pupils that is. The methods of support in place for my AS stemmed from a long winded but successful process to obtain a Special Educational Needs Statement, and these support methods helped lift those aspirations out of the hole in the ground and keep them alive. For example, it supported ways for me to manage a special interest so that it would not detrimentally affect social relations with other people, as it had done previously by boring others to sleep or accentuating teasing. It also helped identify where my additional skills were, as previously these were unbeknown to me including articulation of handwriting and speaking in front of audiences. The characteristic of AS to have difficult self perception was very rife at this stage for me and partly overcoming this can be sourced to educational support methods.

Importance of Routine in the daily life at University and other Commitments

On the most part, despite the odd difficult piece of work or annoyance that I am only in for a few hours a week, I have thoroughly enjoyed town planning as a degree and have bolstered it with as many other commitments as can be enjoyed to my interests within the routine. Living with AS is all about routine, schedule, time commitment and dilligence. I deliberately work on a schedule of making my university week comparable to a full time working week, including getting on with the work in some ways, shapes and forms and even deliberately checking over and working on things to the day before the deadline. I assign a programme of work right from starting an assignment right until the end but often hand in items early to give knowledge that I have that leeway. By comparison, iff you leave things until the last minute there is no chance for a leeway. It is something that I thrive on and being on an ordinary University schedule makes me feel extremely lost, at times lazy and generally uneducated about the wider world. That does not mean I think that fellow students are like this, its just that I cannot suit myself to a slower pace of routine. Despite the packed schedule I hope to convey a dilligence to always be there for people in some capacity. This is part of the compassionate nature that is often forgotten in AS, to try and broaden out to everyone, sometimes manifested out of earlier social problems. I certainly believe that after having no one and establishing better social communication principles that I lead a better life with acquaintances. Cliques are something that depresses me but constitute as everyday life for some. But I did find that in a give or take scenario where we are supposed to look out for each other, my busy schedule was perceived to be ‘Chris is not bothering anymore’. Far from it, I just am a strong convenor/rigid to the give and take principles of social communication. I contact you, you then contact me. Not seen me for a while? Come and visit.This all seems dreadfully authoritarian but in reality if not present there would be plenty of chaotic scenes. Without some rule abidance and schedule I am hardly anything and that is being frank. The anxiety of working without this would be to the scale that I could not go to university. So it has to stay. What I and other people with AS ask kindly without arrogance is that others work around the schedule where possible.

Social Communication

This is the most reported characteristic of having AS and involves the ‘brick wall’ that most of us with the condition experience when concerning interaction with other people. I started off in primary school by not speaking to others, instead communicating through hitting people and sealing off parts of the room for my own use. I also assigned my own table and own computer printed table sign for example. Social communication was limited to specific interest areas, although there was no interaction as this would involve physically taking my toy trains or interrupting my path on the pretend runway for east midlands airport that I was planning to take off from. Both were no go areas. Extend 10 years after this into secondary education and the fundamentals of this still existed but basic communication was still there. But the era is compounded by neglect and isolation and is not favoured in the viewpoints of many people with AS. The time was compounded by an ignorance to realise that ‘difference’ is a virtue sometimes and that not everybody has to be the same.

How has University benefitted me and possibly others with AS?

For me, further and higher education was the getaway from the above thought process. Both were far more inclusive environments to the sociologies of difference and despite lots of work to improve services for disabled people, they allow you to be yourself more. At University there is an ability among others to respect my interests, which in turn improves my ability to respect theirs – another skill added. The closed bubble of University suits me because I can move away from aspects of social life that present anxieties and crucially specify ones that I feel comfortable with. University is beneficial for people with AS including me as it bolsters the leadership skills that enhance group situations that were often so difficult for many of us in previous education, and can still be troublesome. The problem for many people with AS is actually getting to University due to hurdles earlier on. I for example was one of less than 10 students on the spectrum at my whole University upon arrival in 2007/8. Now there are more but we are still talking less than 20. That is a grave concern and I share the plight of going through those difficulties. Many people with AS are incredibly intelligent at what they want to achieve and be interested in and they are often witheld from getting this far.

Additionally, gaining confidence of AS prior to going to University established another specific interest area around the research of autistic spectrum conditions and helping other people with a disability. This has now extended to the representation work that is familiar on this blog and is something I am fascinated and proud to work with. It represents a point where I am happy to have changed to the extent that I have the capacity to help other people out.

What remains a daily difficulty through having AS?

I am going to focus on the most specific of these issues, and they are:

  1. Taking conversation literally and struggling to adapt to change
  2. Sensory difficulties
  3. Trying to water down what I feel comfortable with.

1. The biggest ongoing problem for me with AS is taking conversation literally and struggling to adapt to change. This causes considerable anxiety and often over comparatively small items to other people. This is why there is so  much rhetoric on others presenting a different sensory environment to people with AS so that it is more legible and less full of hurdles.

For example, the worst questions ever posed to me or indeed anyone with AS could be on the lines of the following:

  • “Chris, could you put the paper there please?”
  • “Chris, would you like to meet in the morning, lunchtime or afternoon?”
  • “Oh we’ll see how we feel in the morning and I’ll text you as to when we want to meet up”
  • During a meeting, after bringing all paperwork, through being efficient “we have got full copies for you to take away ….”
  • “Did you have a good weekend Chris?”

These questions are of no use to someone with AS, they do not include many specifics, to incentivise the social communication that can sometimes be difficult with us. It is not that we are weak, or challenged in any way, we just require bolstering to kickstart initial conversation.

But ask me more rigidised questions, and the answers are far more legible.

  • “Shall we say 2.30pm Chris?”
  • “The weather was good this weekend wasn’t it Chris, did you go out on Sunday afternoon too?”
  • “Chris, please can you put the Guardian on the table?”
  • Email before meeting “Copies provided for the meeting attendees”

2. I have acute difficulty with noise, to the extent of kicking up much fuss over fire alarm faults in first year that caused psychological problems and wearing earplugs at most nightclub venues. Without the support of peers this can turn into a very difficult and anxious situation and people with AS, no matter whether acquainted or close to others, need to be recognised that they want reassurance in these situations. Walking off in a nightclub and leaving someone and their AS to deal with it is not comprehendable. Equally, the sensory difficulties are often comparable to the mindblock experienced in exams, you literally freeze and it can often extend as far as a panic attack.

3. The final point is raised in my conclusion, but there have been times in  education where I am on undue pressure to cut back my ‘differences’ to fit in. I say that the way of being slightly bitter in third year at times was a way of fighting this back. I conclude by raising the following comment that I have often raised in presentations about AS to academics, students and professionals:

“Taking the negative issues out of the equation it is simply an absolute delight to recall past aspects of being a standalone figure in the class, the home, the street and other environments. Turn back the clock and I could not envisage any pride of having a behavioural problem, but now I find lots of the characteristics that define me as positive, not the generic person on the street as positive. A particular comfort zone is having old fashioned ways, itself manifested out of my AS. Here there is no chance of me retreating from the armchair, cup of tea in hand and the box set of Keeping Up Appearances being put to full use, in exchange of a hip life of being Mr ‘me-too’, watching the latest hit reality television nonsense and buying out any product with the letter i at the beginning. I am simply not like the latter, and instead prefer to blend idiosyncrasy with a slight hint of modern. I’ve only just got used to the idea of keeping up with fashions and at least consider myself as aware of cars and the music scene, house and chill out in particular which are certainly not backward. But that is crucially me and my ways in my world when appropriate that is surely something to treasure when there is so much pressure these days to be monotonous, and what the media or your peers insinuate you should be like.”

Thanks for looking,

Chris

NUS Disabled Students: Regional responsibility for East Midlands Further & Higher Education Students’ Unions

Hello,

As part of the NUS Disabled Students’ Committee, members are assigned regional responsibilities for contacting and assisting Students’ Unions. I am pleased to represent Further & Higher Education Universities and Colleges in the East Midlands.

I hope to be approachable to your Students’ Union, including visiting in person when and where possible. A full list of Unions under my remit are included below:

Please  get in touch when in need of advice and consultation, and I must stress that the NUS Disabled Students’ Campaign is delighted to be working with Unions in the East Midlands, and will be in contact regarding our campaign priorities and how we can work together to deliver them in the interests of the student body.

Thanks for looking,

Chris

Further and Higher Education Institutions of the East Midlands

Representative: Chris Jesson                              Term: 2010-11

East Midlands Universities

University of Derby SU                                                         

University of Leicester SU                                                        

De Montfort University SU, Leicester

University of Lincoln SU                                                

Loughborough University SU                                          

University of Northampton SU                                        

University of Nottingham SU                                    

Nottingham Trent University SU                                                  

East Midlands University Colleges

Bishop Grosseteste University College, Lincoln

East Midlands FE Colleges

St Johns College Students Union, Beeston

Boston College Students Union, Boston

Chesterfield College SU, Chesterfield

Stevenson College SU, Coalville

Derby College SU, Derby

Grantham College Students Union, Grantham

Grimsby Institute of Further and Higher Education, Grimsby

South East Derbyshire College SU, Ilkeston

Tresham College of Further and Higher Education SU, Kettering

Gateway College SU, Leicester

Regent College SU, Leicester

South Leicestershire College SU, Leicester

Wyggeston and Queen Elizabeth College SU, Leicester

Lincoln College Students Union, Lincoln      

Brooksby Melton College SU, Melton Mowbray

Northampton College SU, Northampton

Bilborough Form VI College SU, Nottingham

Castle College Nottingham SU, Nottingham

Midlands Academy of Dance and Drama SU, Nottingham

New College Nottingham SU, Nottingham

South Nottingham College SU, Nottingham

West Nottinghamshire College SU, Mansfield

New College Stamford SU, Stamford

John Leggott College Students Union, Scunthorpe

North Nottinghamshire College SU, Worksop